[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19339.35216.412591.13392@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:32:00 +0100
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, andi@...stfloor.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] compiler: prevent dead store elimination
Arjan van de Ven writes:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:47:42 +0100
> Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> > +void secure_bzero(void *p, size_t n)
> > +{
> > + memset(p, 0, n);
> > + ARRAY_PREVENT_DSE(p, n);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(secure_bzero);
>
>
> please don't introduce bzero again to the kernel;
>
> make it secure_memset() please.
In principle I would agree, but bzero() avoids the unfortunately
rather common mistake of swapping the int/size_t parameters to
memset(). I.e., people writing memset(p, n, 0) not memset(p, 0, n).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists