[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267437213.2127.18.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:53:33 +0000
From: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] block: don't access jiffies when initialising io_context
As the comment says the initial value of last_waited is never used, so
there is no need to initialise it with the current jiffies. Jiffies is
hot enough without accessing it for no reason.
Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
---
patch against 2.6.33
compiled & tested on x86_64
diff --git a/block/blk-ioc.c b/block/blk-ioc.c
index 98e6bf6..3f65c8a 100644
--- a/block/blk-ioc.c
+++ b/block/blk-ioc.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct io_context *alloc_io_context(gfp_t gfp_flags, int node)
spin_lock_init(&ret->lock);
ret->ioprio_changed = 0;
ret->ioprio = 0;
- ret->last_waited = jiffies; /* doesn't matter... */
+ ret->last_waited = 0; /* doesn't matter... */
ret->nr_batch_requests = 0; /* because this is 0 */
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&ret->radix_root, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_HIGH);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ret->cic_list);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists