[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B8C3933.7080507@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:01:23 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/irq] x86: apic: Fix mismerge, add arch_probe_nr_irqs()
again
On 03/01/2010 01:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> - Xen has an array irq_info[NR_IRQS] one of the last static arrays
>> sized at NR_IRQs in the entire kernel.
>>
> Hopefully the same info as is in that array could (and indeed should) be
> instead stored in irq_desc->chip_data. Would you object to
> arch_init_copy_chip_data and arch_free_chip_data becoming function
> pointers within the struct irq_chip?
>
Yes, I was just about to suggest something like this. We just need a
mechanism of storing some per-irq info, and attaching it to the existing
desc structure is much cleaner than maintaining some parallel structure.
You're right about the chip_data lifetime functions; it seems very odd
that most of irq_chip is nicely factored out into a set of ops, but the
per-chip data management is per-architecture.
With that in place, we could eliminate any dependency on irq numbers.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists