[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100301010849.GA7210@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 02:08:52 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the blackfin tree
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:03:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> After merging the blackfin tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:402: error: redefinition of 'arch_syscall_addr'
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c:397: note: previous definition of 'arch_syscall_addr' was here
>
> Caused by commit d156d1881ea54ec609d92388601661c2679439bb ("ftrace: unify
> arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from the blackfin tree interacting
Oh, why is this patch in the blackfin tree?
> with commit e7b8e675d9c71b868b66f62f725a948047514719 ("tracing: Unify
> arch_syscall_addr() implementations") from Linus' tree.
>
> These are slightly different versions of the same patch. but merging with the blackfin tree managed to add a second copy of the above function. I have applied the following patch for today.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:56:09 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] blackfin: fix mismerge of kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 5 -----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> index 37ca709..cba47d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -399,11 +399,6 @@ unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr)
> return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr];
> }
>
> -unsigned long __init arch_syscall_addr(int nr)
> -{
> - return (unsigned long)sys_call_table[nr];
> -}
> -
> int __init init_ftrace_syscalls(void)
> {
> struct syscall_metadata *meta;
Looks like the right patch yeah.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists