lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1003021845310.1594@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:01:05 +1100 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, Alex Elder <aelder@....com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	a.gruenbacher@...puter.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted'
 xattrs

I noticed that there are differences in the behavior of listxattr(2) for 
xattrs in the trusted namespace.

Some filesystems, such as ext[234], require CAP_SYS_ADMIN for this, i.e. 
trusted xattr names are hidden from unprivileged users.

I audited the kernel for users of the trusted xattr namespace, and found 
the following filesystems not checking for CAP_SYS_ADMIN:

  - jffs2
  - ocfs2
  - btrfs
  - xfs

I've created patches for jffs2 (tested) and ocfs2 (not tested) to add the 
check -- see following emails. btrfs and xfs have custom listxattr 
operations and will need a bit more work to fix.

I'm not sure what the initial intention was for the behavior, although 
given that several major filesystems are have been fielded with the 
CAP_SYS_ADMIN check, it seems most prudent to make this the standard 
behavior for all filesystems, in case any users are depending on it.

Thoughts?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ