[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <2B059650-E1D4-4BED-84A6-64C3419E0ACF@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:28:15 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>, Alex Elder <aelder@....com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
a.gruenbacher@...puter.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted'
xattrs
On 2010-03-02, at 01:01, James Morris wrote:
> I noticed that there are differences in the behavior of listxattr(2)
> for
> xattrs in the trusted namespace.
>
> Some filesystems, such as ext[234], require CAP_SYS_ADMIN for this,
> i.e.
> trusted xattr names are hidden from unprivileged users.
This matches my understanding of the trusted.* namespace. It is
settable by the kernel and root (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) but not regular users.
> I'm not sure what the initial intention was for the behavior, although
> given that several major filesystems are have been fielded with the
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN check, it seems most prudent to make this the standard
> behavior for all filesystems, in case any users are depending on it.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists