lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100302132718.GB6821@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 05:27:18 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
	dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: suppress RCU lockdep
	warnings during early boot

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 01:20:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > +	if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > +		return 1;
> > +	return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
> 
> > +	if (!rcu_scheduler_active || !debug_locks)
> > +		return 1;
> > +	return lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
> 
> i guess there could be a common helper here?

Will do!

> Also, could we clear rcu_scheduler_active when we clear debug_locks? That way 
> only a single test is needed, a generic 'is lock debugging active'.

Doing that will break synchronize_rcu(), which returns immediately if
!rcu_scheduler_active.

> (Which test should probably be unlikely() as well?)

Good point, will fix.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ