linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 66/66] arch/um/sys-x86_64/shared/sysdep/skas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:18:11 +0100
From:	Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...ma.net>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 66/66] arch/um/sys-x86_64/shared/sysdep/skas_ptrace.h: 
	Checkpatch cleanup

2010/2/28 Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>:
Hi Jeff,
   and thanks for your reply.

> checkpatch violations.  I cleaned up a lot of it while making other
> changes in the area.  This sort of thing I think is reasonably
> worthwhile, but dumping in a whole lot of checkpatch changes doesn't
> help anything and it just pollutes the change history.

   Yep, I talked about side effects (i.e git-blame) with Alessandro (Rubini).
   If you think it could be useuful I can check all the subtree. Send
you patches (if any).
   You can merge piece of them as soon as you modify files with real
patches, so you
   don't have to do the boring business. I don't care to have credits
about 'em, and it's not
   a problem if you will not use them.

Thanks a lot,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/