linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201003020934.56614.sheng@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:34:56 +0800
From:	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@...citrix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/7][v4] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen

On Tuesday 02 March 2010 09:32:20 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/01/2010 05:26 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> >> Why 2.6.33?  I'm currently working on 2.6.32; I intend to move to .33
> >> shortly, but .32 is a much more convenient base (particularly if you're
> >> interested in getting these changes into any distro kernels).
> >>
> >> I rebased it to .32 without much effort.
> >
> > OK.
> 
> Hm, looks like the x86_platform_ipi stuff is missing in .32.
> 
I thought that one should still called smp_generic_interrupt in .32?

-- 
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/