[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12806278.317911267574120161.JavaMail.root@zimbra>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:55:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Ari Entlich <atrigent@....neu.edu>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/36] tty: Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS
but doesn't require a VT_RELDISP ioctl call
Hello!
Could you please remove this patch from your 2.6.34 tty pull request?
Andrew Morton questioned whether this should actually be used yet[1],
and I responded confirming his suspicions[2]. In addition, this patch
has not "been in the linux-next and -mm releases for a number of
weeks now", as you suggest in your pull request.
Thanks!
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126687954823617
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126689506608539
----- "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> From: Ari Entlich <atrigent@....neu.edu>
>
> This new VT mode (VT_PROCESS_AUTO) does everything that VT_PROCESS does
> except that it doesn't wait for a VT_RELDISP ioctl before switching
> away from a VT with that mode.
>
> [etc, etc...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists