[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100304.004104.24320938.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:41:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: efault@....de
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [rfc/rft][patch] should use scheduler sync hint in
tcp_prequeue()?
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:46:50 +0100
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 06:05 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
>> It definitely looks like an oversight to me and we should add
>> be using wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll() in tcp_prequeue()
>> as above.
>>
>> Ingo?
>
> Implied ack from network maintainer implies ship it to me.
>
> net: add scheduler sync hint to tcp_prequeue().
>
> Decreases the odds wakee will suffer from frequent cache misses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists