[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B8F9FC6.9030105@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:55:50 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Erik Andrén <erik.andren@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: Gspca USB driver zc3xx and STV06xx probe the same device ..
Hi,
On 03/04/2010 12:36 PM, Erik Andrén wrote:
> 2010/3/4 Hans de Goede<hdegoede@...hat.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/03/2010 02:17 PM, Erik Andrén wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/3/3 Gabriel C<nix.or.die@...glemail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I own a QuickCam Messanger webcam.. I didn't used it in ages but today
>>>> I plugged it in..
>>>> ( Device 002: ID 046d:08da Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Messanger )
>>>>
>>>> Now zc3xx and stv06xx are starting both to probe the device .. In
>>>> 2.6.33 that result in a not working webcam.
>>>> ( rmmod both&& modprobe zc3xx one seems to fix that )
>>>>
>>>> On current git head zc3xx works fine even when both are probing the
>>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> Also I noticed stv06xx fails anyway for my webcam with this error:
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> [ 360.910243] STV06xx: Configuring camera
>>>> [ 360.910244] STV06xx: st6422 sensor detected
>>>> [ 360.910245] STV06xx: Initializing camera
>>>> [ 361.161948] STV06xx: probe of 6-1:1.0 failed with error -32
>>>> [ 361.161976] usbcore: registered new interface driver STV06xx
>>>> [ 361.161978] STV06xx: registered
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>> Next thing is stv06xx tells it is an st6422 sensor and does not work
>>>> with it while zc3xx tells it is an HV7131R(c) sensor and works fine
>>>> with it.
>>>>
>>>> What is right ?
>>>
>>> Hans,
>>> As you added support for the st6422 sensor to the stv06xx subdriver I
>>> imagine you best know what's going on.
>>>
>>
>> I took the USB-ID in question from the out of tree v4l1 driver I was basing
>> my
>> st6422 work on. Looking at the other ID's (which are very close together)
>> and
>> combining that with this bug report, I think it is safe to say that the
>> USB-ID
>> in question should be removed from the stv06xx driver.
>>
>> Erik will you handle this, or shall I ?
>>
> Either way is fine by me.
> I can try to do it tonight.
>
If you could take care of this that would be great!
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists