linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.33 on jetway nc81-lf board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B8FC4F1.70605@xs4all.nl>
Date:	Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:34:25 +0100
From:	Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>
To:	Andre Prendel <andre.prendel@....de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.33 on jetway nc81-lf board

On 03/04/2010 10:17 AM, Andre Prendel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:37:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> (cc lm-sensors)
>>
>> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:21:12 +0100 Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl> wrote:
(....)
>>> No other sensor-related modules are loaded.
>>>
>>> What could be wrong?
> 
> See lm-sensors FAQ Chapter3 #39:
> 
>   http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31

Thanks, but the explanation implies no real fix other than more
consciously choosing to put system stability at risk.
Is a better fix in the making?

Kind regards,
Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/