[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100304171143.GG3073@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:41:43 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm 0/4] memcg: per cgroup dirty limit (v4)
* Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com> [2010-03-04 11:40:11]:
> Control the maximum amount of dirty pages a cgroup can have at any given time.
>
> Per cgroup dirty limit is like fixing the max amount of dirty (hard to reclaim)
> page cache used by any cgroup. So, in case of multiple cgroup writers, they
> will not be able to consume more than their designated share of dirty pages and
> will be forced to perform write-out if they cross that limit.
>
> The overall design is the following:
>
> - account dirty pages per cgroup
> - limit the number of dirty pages via memory.dirty_ratio / memory.dirty_bytes
> and memory.dirty_background_ratio / memory.dirty_background_bytes in
> cgroupfs
> - start to write-out (background or actively) when the cgroup limits are
> exceeded
>
> This feature is supposed to be strictly connected to any underlying IO
> controller implementation, so we can stop increasing dirty pages in VM layer
> and enforce a write-out before any cgroup will consume the global amount of
> dirty pages defined by the /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio|dirty_bytes and
> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio|dirty_background_bytes limits.
>
> Changelog (v3 -> v4)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> * handle the migration of tasks across different cgroups
> NOTE: at the moment we don't move charges of file cache pages, so this
> functionality is not immediately necessary. However, since the migration of
> file cache pages is in plan, it is better to start handling file pages
> anyway.
> * properly account dirty pages in nilfs2
> (thanks to Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>)
> * lockless access to dirty memory parameters
> * fix: page_cgroup lock must not be acquired under mapping->tree_lock
> (thanks to Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> and
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>)
> * code restyling
>
This seems to be converging, what sort of tests are you running on
this patchset?
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists