linux-kernel - Re: [linux-cifs-client] [RFC PATCH] CIFS posix acl permission checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100304173345.GE18904@samba1>
Date:	Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:33:45 -0800
From:	Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
To:	simo <idra@...ba.org>
Cc:	Jon Severinsson <jon@...erinsson.net>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] [RFC PATCH] CIFS posix acl permission
	checking

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:51:53AM -0500, simo wrote:
> 
> Letting a different user access the mount point *is* a security
> violation in itself. The CIFS security model lies in per user sessions.
> The right way to fix the problem is multi-session mounts. Allowing a
> different user to use a user session is a violation of the security
> model of CIFS.

Multi-session mounts are the only sane fix. This is what Windows
does in their redirectory (when a process with different credentials
traverses into a mount point a new sessionsetup is done to get remote
credentials).

Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/