[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267725262.25158.206.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:54:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
eranian@...gle.com, robert.richter@....com, fweisbec@...il.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 11:21 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +#define perf_misc_flags(regs) \
> > +({ int misc = 0; \
> > + if (user_mode(regs)) \
> > + misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER; \
> > + else \
> > + misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL; \
> > + if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT) \
> > + misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT; \
> > + misc; })
> > +
> > +#define perf_instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->ip)
>
> Hmm, why don't you use instruction_pointer() defined in asm/ptrace.h?
> And I couldn't find any user of this macro in this patch...
perf_instruction_pointer() is used in kernel/perf_event.c, and yeah I
could have used instruction_pointer() but that's yet another wrapper.
Anyway, Yanmin is poking at doing kvm-guest profiling and will likely
rewrite all of the perf_misc() and perf_instruction_pointer() stuff
soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists