[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B900809.7050406@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:20:41 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] genericirq: make irq_chip related function to take
desc
On 03/04/2010 11:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 03/04/2010 06:31 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> The code which uses the chip functions needs to be changed:
>>>
>>> - desc->chip->fun(irq);
>>> + desc->chip->fun(desc);
>>>
>>> That's mostly in kernel/irq/* but there are some users in arch/*
>>> lowlevel irq handling code as well.
>>
>> that is our -v2 version.
>
> I know, but the difference is that it is done by a machine.
>
> I have been involved in more than one large scale overhaul projects in
> the kernel and most of the time I spent on those was to figure out the
> right way to do it to limit the risks.
sure.
>
> Automated conversion is the best thing you can do and if Julia can
> whip up that rules, I'm less worried about the wholesale switchover on
> a per function basis, than I'm scared about the fully manual approach
> you took.
ok, let wait for Julia to check it...
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists