[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003042323090.2014@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:26:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: spurious irq detection for threaded irqs
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> -void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> - irqreturn_t action_ret)
> +void note_threaded_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> + irqreturn_t action_ret)
> {
> if (unlikely(action_ret != IRQ_HANDLED)) {
> /*
> @@ -262,6 +262,19 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
> }
>
> +void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> + irqreturn_t action_ret)
> +{
> + if (action_ret == IRQ_WAKE_THREAD)
> + /* handled in irq_thread() when the threaded handler returns */
> + return;
> +
> + /* don't report IRQ_WAKE_THREAD | IRQ_HANDLED as bogus return value */
> + action_ret &= ~IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +
> + note_threaded_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret);
> +}
> +
We don't need an extra function for that. A simple
if (action_ret & IRQ_WAKE_THREAD)
return;
in note_interrupt() is sufficient to cover everything.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists