[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100304143837.af39845d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:38:37 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros,
recursive vsnprintf
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:27:21 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> (Typo'ed Linus' email address, added Greg KH and netdev)
What is the networking significance here?
> dev_<level> macros use a lot of repetitive string space.
>
> Eliminate the string prefixes and function arguments from all the macro uses
> and consolidate them in functions.
>
> This patchset saves about 60K.
>
> This implementation also adds the ability to use a struct va_format to
> emit a format string along with va_list arguments.
>
> This %pV implementation should not be used without a wrapper that
> does printf argument verification like the dev_<level> functions.
>
> Inspired a bit by Nick Andrew's patches and Linus' comments in December 2008
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/6/15
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/6/101
>
Looks like a reasonable approach, although I didn't check how much
additional stack the recursion will take. Bear in mind that printk()
can be called from super-deep contexts.
What would I need to do to make it recur more than once? Include a %pV
in a string, like dev_printk("%s", %%pV")?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists