[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003041449380.3751@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:54:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephane Marchesin <stephane.marchesin@...il.com>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
>
> In short, the "don't break user space interfaces" principle is making
> user space code quality worse for everyone. And it makes our lives as
> graphics developers pretty miserable actually
And _my_ point is that if you did a half-way decent job on versioning, you
wouldn't be in the crappy situation you are now.
For chissake, the DRM versioning model is a total disaster. The reason you
can never ever break user space interfaces is exactly because when you
break them, X stops working.
What I suggested is to _keep_ a working model across different versions,
so that you can get out of the rat-hole you are in now (and the rat-hole
you put your users into, and the distributions).
It's simply _not_ acceptable to tie the X server and the kernel version so
tightly together as the crazy DRM model does right now. It's not all that
different from us requiring people to install a new glibc every once in a
while, just because we added a new filesystem. Everybody understands that
that would be totally insane.
Why does the X community not understand simple library versioning?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists