linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm request 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21d7e9971003041503p726ecbebi4b0b97854c5824de@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:03:03 +1000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stephane Marchesin <stephane.marchesin@...il.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
>>
>> In short, the "don't break user space interfaces" principle is making
>> user space code quality worse for everyone. And it makes our lives as
>> graphics developers pretty miserable actually
>
> And _my_ point is that if you did a half-way decent job on versioning, you
> wouldn't be in the crappy situation you are now.
>
> For chissake, the DRM versioning model is a total disaster. The reason you
> can never ever break user space interfaces is exactly because when you
> break them, X stops working.

Stop aligning DRM versioning with nouveau versioning. This isn't a generic
problem with DRM, we've supported versioning interfaces for years and
have broken them maybe once.

> What I suggested is to _keep_ a working model across different versions,
> so that you can get out of the rat-hole you are in now (and the rat-hole
> you put your users into, and the distributions).
>
> It's simply _not_ acceptable to tie the X server and the kernel version so
> tightly together as the crazy DRM model does right now. It's not all that
> different from us requiring people to install a new glibc every once in a
> while, just because we added a new filesystem. Everybody understands that
> that would be totally insane.
>
> Why does the X community not understand simple library versioning?

Its nouveau project not X not DRM, stop generalising the situation.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/