[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B8F3056.1010109@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:00:22 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: depends on INET
On 03/03/10 19:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
>> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:08:23 -0800
>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>>
>>> br_multicast calls ip_send_check(), so it should depend on INET.
>>>
>>> built-in:
>>> br_multicast.c:(.text+0x88cf4): undefined reference to `ip_send_check'
>>>
>>> or modular:
>>> ERROR: "ip_send_check" [net/bridge/bridge.ko] undefined!
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>>
>> Applied, but I almost lost this patch.
>>
>> You need to CC: netdev on all networking patches so that it
>> gets properly tracked in patchwork and therefore does not get
>> lost.
>
> I suspect Randy went by the MAINTAINERS entry - you might want to add netdev
> as a second 'L:' line:
>
> ETHERNET BRIDGE
> M: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> L: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> W: http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Net:Bridge
> S: Maintained
> F: include/linux/netfilter_bridge/
> F: net/bridge/
>
> To make it really clear that netdev must be Cc:-ed for those patches.
Ack that. I also expected Stephen to merge it...
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists