[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100305073850.GA20980@matterhorn.verdurent.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:38:50 +0200
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Cc: Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ambient Light Sensors subsystem
On 10 Mar 03, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping IIO would fill the niche of framework for generic data
> > acquisition devices, regardless of how fast or slow they are.
> We are working on it, but unfortunately the 'fast' end of the scale is
> making it rather complex beast and there is still a fair bit of work
> to be done before we suggest merging into the main tree. We allow
> for 'simple' drivers that do have very similar functionality to ALS as
> proposed. (i.e. they just handle some sysfs interfaces and device
> registration).
>
> I certainly have no objection to taking light sensors back into IIO.
> (one never moved out!) Obviously I'll want opinions from the individual
I suspect you are pointing to the tsl2563 driver here. It's rework (iio->als)
has been languishing in my tasklist for a couple of months now. I haven't had
time for testing.
I guess I'll wait some more to see where this discussion goes.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Developer, Verdurent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists