[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1267781969.16716.55.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:39:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Walk through the relevant events only
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 08:00 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Each time a trace event triggers, we walk through the entire
> list of events from the active contexts to find the perf events
> that match the current one.
>
> This is wasteful. To solve this, we maintain a per cpu list of
> the active perf events for each running trace events and we
> directly commit to these.
Right, so this seems a little trace specific. I once thought about using
a hash table to do this for all software events. It also keeps it all
nicely inside perf_event.[ch].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists