[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003050714380.3788@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:18:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@...hscale.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
> staging != stable
This really is being repeated, over and over. But it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant because it's just a bad _excuse_.
That driver is used in production environments. That's _reality_. The
whole "staging" thing is nothing more than a meaningless word.
And no, "staging" wasn't why it was merged. The reason it was merged was
that very same "reality".
So every time somebody mentions staging as an argument, he's missing the
whole effing point.
It also misses the point that the issues I've tried to bring up
(bisection, testability) are real _technical_ arguments. Again, waving
that "staging" flag is just stupid. It has nothing to do with the
technical arguments, or with the reality of the situation.
In other words, it's not just an excuse, it's a _meaningless_ excuse. It's
a red herring. It's irrelevant to the issue.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists