lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:18:28 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"C. Bergström" <cbergstrom@...hscale.com>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3



On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>
> staging != stable

This really is being repeated, over and over. But it's irrelevant.

It's irrelevant because it's just a bad _excuse_.

That driver is used in production environments. That's _reality_. The 
whole "staging" thing is nothing more than a meaningless word.

And no, "staging" wasn't why it was merged. The reason it was merged was 
that very same "reality".

So every time somebody mentions staging as an argument, he's missing the 
whole effing point.

It also misses the point that the issues I've tried to bring up 
(bisection, testability) are real _technical_ arguments. Again, waving 
that "staging" flag is just stupid. It has nothing to do with the 
technical arguments, or with the reality of the situation. 

In other words, it's not just an excuse, it's a _meaningless_ excuse. It's 
a red herring. It's irrelevant to the issue.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists