linux-kernel - Re: Making Xorg easier to test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:06:09 +0200
From:	Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mattst88@...il.com, crmafra2@...il.com, skeggsb@...il.com,
	airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	dri-devel@...ts.sf.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Making Xorg easier to test

On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:49:32AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
> > I understand that you guys are upset about this, so maybe you'd like to
> > donate, say, 10% of your developer base to help out? That'd be pretty
> > ace.
> 
> You have to support less than %10 of the amount of hardware we have to
> support.

With a great deal less than 10% of the number of developers.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped