[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100305161143.GG2505@tempa>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:11:43 +0200
From: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Making Xorg easier to test (was Re: [git pull] drm request 3)
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:53:46AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> These days, there's a few dependencies you need to know about (I do agree
> that from a user perspective the thing might have been made a bit _too_
> modular)
Indeed, no argument here.
> That said, the _one_ thing I really wish could be done would be to make it
> easier to install things side-by-side - and with the modularization, you
> really do want to do it module-by-module. One of the things that makes it
> so easy to test the kernel is that when you install one kernel, that
> doesn't affect the others, and you can go back-and-forth in testing.
> That's really important, because it makes testing trivial and non-scary
> even in the presense of issues that makes the new version unusable.
FWIW, Option "ModulePath" in xorg.conf lets you more or less do this;
the usual approach is to install your new server + drivers into a
separate prefix.
Cheers,
Daniel
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists