lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <586c2acd1003050958p49c9f27u8331756183c419cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:58:05 -0500
From:	Younes Manton <younes.m@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, skeggsb@...il.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	daniel@...ishbar.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:02:17 +0000
>
>>> You can't unleash something like this on a userbase of this magnitude
>>> and then throw your hands up in the air and say "I'm not willing to
>>> support this in a reasonable way."
>>
>> Not to belabour the obvious - they didn't. Linus ordered them to merge it.
>
> And I'm arguing not merging it upstream would be like saying
> the same thing.
>

No, it's not like saying the same thing. Not merging it upstream is
saying "we're not willing to support this in a reasonable way *at this
time*."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ