lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003052208.09486.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:08:09 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
	USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with remote-wakeup settings

Am Freitag, 5. März 2010 21:59:31 schrieben Sie:
> > I guess it's better if drivers don't set should_wakeup if unsure, but of course
> > that's impossible to enforce.
> 
> That's the real question.  Ideally, drivers won't touch should_wakeup.  
> How do we get there from here?

Enable it only for devices specifically designed for wakeup, that is
keyboards, power buttons and WoL, perhaps also mice and modems.
Are we far away from that?

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ