lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:13:30 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF_BIAS based on cpufreq governor On Fri 2010-03-05 20:55:22, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > That can be only true if it does not give benefits period... AC and > > battery power are quite different scenarios. > > No, they're not. Yes, they are. Would you care to elaborate? I may very well want top power on AC power, and max powersavings on battery; most people do. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists