linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100305211329.GC20554@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:13:30 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF_BIAS based on cpufreq
 governor

On Fri 2010-03-05 20:55:22, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > That can be only true if it does not give benefits period... AC and
> > battery power are quite different scenarios.
> 
> No, they're not.

Yes, they are.

Would you care to elaborate? I may very well want top power on AC
power, and max powersavings on battery; most people do.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/