lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1267830207-9474-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri,  5 Mar 2010 15:03:25 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] ftrace: replace read_barrier_depends() with rcu_dereference_raw()

Replace the calls to read_barrier_depends() in ftrace_list_func() with
rcu_dereference_raw() to improve readability.  The reason that we use
rcu_dereference_raw() here is that removed entries are never freed,
instead they are simply leaked.  This is one of a very few cases where
use of rcu_dereference_raw() is the long-term right answer.  And I don't
yet know of any others.  ;-)

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c |   22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 8378357..8c5adc0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/ctype.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
 #include <trace/events/sched.h>
 
@@ -88,18 +89,22 @@ ftrace_func_t ftrace_pid_function __read_mostly = ftrace_stub;
 static int ftrace_set_func(unsigned long *array, int *idx, char *buffer);
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Traverse the ftrace_list, invoking all entries.  The reason that we
+ * can use rcu_dereference_raw() is that elements removed from this list
+ * are simply leaked, so there is no need to interact with a grace-period
+ * mechanism.  The rcu_dereference_raw() calls are needed to handle
+ * concurrent insertions into the ftrace_list.
+ *
+ * Silly Alpha and silly pointer-speculation compiler optimizations!
+ */
 static void ftrace_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
 {
-	struct ftrace_ops *op = ftrace_list;
-
-	/* in case someone actually ports this to alpha! */
-	read_barrier_depends();
+	struct ftrace_ops *op = rcu_dereference_raw(ftrace_list); /*see above*/
 
 	while (op != &ftrace_list_end) {
-		/* silly alpha */
-		read_barrier_depends();
 		op->func(ip, parent_ip);
-		op = op->next;
+		op = rcu_dereference_raw(op->next); /*see above*/
 	};
 }
 
@@ -154,8 +159,7 @@ static int __register_ftrace_function(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
 	 * the ops->next pointer is valid before another CPU sees
 	 * the ops pointer included into the ftrace_list.
 	 */
-	smp_wmb();
-	ftrace_list = ops;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(ftrace_list, ops);
 
 	if (ftrace_enabled) {
 		ftrace_func_t func;
-- 
1.6.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ