| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B909016.1070605@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:01:10 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: werner@...ane.dyn-o-saur.com CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.33 problems On 03/03/2010 01:24 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Here, the unit size is 2M and the chunk size 4M for the two possible > cpus. This isn't excessive at all and i386 shouldn't have much > problem accomodating it. Have you tried percpu_alloc=page? Ping? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists