[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100306170620.GA24344@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 09:06:20 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, werner@...ane.dyn-o-saur.com,
Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.33 bugs (USBFS, Intel graphic)
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:30:44PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hm, so it's back to the original idea of just doing a kzalloc of the
> >> > initial buffer, that should solve the problem that Marcus found.
> >> >
> >> > I'll go dig that back up and if you could test it, that would be most
> >> > appreciated.
> >>
> >> Here's a better solution. ?In theory we could copy just the individual
> >> packets from within the transfer buffer, but that would probably take
> >> longer than simply copying the whole buffer.
> >>
> >> (This was a little hasty; I haven't even compile-tested the patch.
> >> Some small fixes may be needed.)
> >
> > Markus, did you test this patch out?
> >
>
> works properly with ISO, (bulk is not tested from my side). please
> merge asap this also affects scanners (SANE).
Great, Alan, care to resend this to me with a signed-off-by line so I
can get it queued up properly?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists