[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2r5nxp9np.fsf@ssh.synack.fr>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:50:02 +0100
From: Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca, kaber@...sh.net,
zbr@...emap.net, nhorman@...driver.com, root@...aldomain.pl,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/10] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> writes:
> Regarding [RFC v2 05/10] snet: introduce snet_event
> +int snet_event_is_registered(const enum snet_syscall syscall, const u8 protocol)
>
> Maybe rcu_read_lock() is better than rw spinlock because this function is
> frequently called.
Indeed. Evgeniy Polyakov already noticed that, it's on my TODO.
thank you Tetsuo
sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists