linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm request 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:28:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3



On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:

> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 09:40 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Why are people making excuses for bad programming and bad technology?
> 
> Is not bad technology is new technology, the API have to change faster ,
> unless you want wait 2 years until get "stable" .  

F*ck me, but people are being dense.

With my suggestion, people could change the API _more_, because it 
wouldn't be as painful.

This is not about "change the ABI or not". This is about "since you change 
the ABI, do it _well_, so that it doesn't hurt people as much".

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/