linux-kernel - Re: [patch] security: ima_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ea6602021003061330j56132f8er73e27f017e6b9d09@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:30:33 -0500
From:	Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"J.R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] security: ima_file_mmap() don't just return zero

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> wrote:
> It seems like we should return an error here.  That's what the comment
> says we should do.
>
> I also removed an out of date comment.  It wasn't needed and seemed likely
> to get out of date again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> ---
> This was found with a static checker and I have only compile tested it.
> The callers all seem to use the return code, but please review carefully.
> The code has been like this since the module was merged.
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 294b005..90d5314 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -260,18 +260,17 @@ out:
>  * policy decision.
>  *
>  * Return 0 on success, an error code on failure.
> - * (Based on the results of appraise_measurement().)
>  */
>  int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
>  {
> -       int rc;
> +       int rc = 0;
>
>        if (!file)
>                return 0;
>        if (prot & PROT_EXEC)
>                rc = process_measurement(file, file->f_dentry->d_name.name,
>                                         MAY_EXEC, FILE_MMAP);
> -       return 0;
> +       return rc;
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

Looks good, and nice work here :)

Acked-by: Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10@...il.com>

-- 
Regards,
Vikram Dhillon

~~~
There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but
only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/