linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1267911399.849.39.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date:	Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:36:39 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros,
 recursive vsnprintf

On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 15:06 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What would I need to do to make it recur more than once?  Include a %pV
> > in a string, like dev_printk("%s", %%pV")?
> 
> I would argue that if somebody does that, they're just broken.
> 
> The single level of recursion is really nice - it solves a real annoyance. 
> But if somebody starts trying to do multiple levels, that's just crazy.
> 
> Of course, I guess we don't relly have any way of sanely _counting_ the 
> recursion level, so we'd have to just trust people to not do crazy things. 
> 
> And that's a big thing to take on trust ;)

Is that an ack, a nack or a get the hell out?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/