[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1003080811220.30507@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:23:30 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
Subject: Re: Upstream first policy
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>
>> I recommend you don't look at Ubuntu, we might have a lot of extra
>> crud[2] in the kernel if you do. :) (Actually, shockingly less than I
>> thought, just apparmor, aufs, ndiswrapper are the obvious ones.)
>
> Ok, so ndiswrapper falls under the "yeah, no" heading.
>
> But apparmor was supposed to be on the "yeah, we'll merge it" path, I
> talked to somebody about it not _that_ long ago. Some of the security
> people object, but they object for all the wrong reasons and I really do
> think that since it's getting used, we really should merge it.
The AppArmor developer has been posting patches for review -- there's
nothing stopping the code being merged except for the need to address
purely technical issues raised by reviewers, which is ongoing.
See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.lsm/10443
> Although there was _some_ noise about Ubuntu trying to move away from
> it.. But that may have been more of the whole FUD thing from the people
> who for some unfathomable reason think that inodes are more important
> than pathnames.
Hey, thanks for another random unfounded personal attack, it's really
appreciated.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists