| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:05:21 +1100 From: dave b <db.pub.mail@...il.com> To: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de> Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: weirdness with compiling a 2.6.33 kernel on arm debian Ok... however how should one test the memory of an arm machine? ... memtest is only for x86. *I am referring to the kernel memtest and not memtest86. On 6 March 2010 21:41, Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:24:49PM +1100, dave b wrote: >> On 6 March 2010 20:03, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote: >> > dave b writes: >> > > Hi have now successfully built a 2.6.33 kernel on a linkstation pro >> > > v2. This is an arm device. It is currently running debian lenny >> > > armel. >> > > >> > > >> > > I compiled (make) zImage, then did a make modules which failed on the >> > > first two rounds of compiling the modules - >> > > >> > > "fs/afs/super.c: In function ‘afs_test_super’: >> > > fs/afs/super.c:278: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault >> > > Please submit a full bug report, >> > > with preprocessed source if appropriate. >> > > See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions." >> > > This was the error encountered on the attempt at compiling the >> > > modules. >> > > >> > > "crypto/gcm.c: In function ‘crypto_gcm_setauthsize’: >> > > crypto/gcm.c:152: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault >> > > Please submit a full bug report, >> > > with preprocessed source if appropriate. >> > > See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions. >> > > make[1]: *** [crypto/gcm.o] Error 1" >> > > This was the error the on the second attempt at compiling the modules. >> > > >> > > The 3rd attempt at building the modules was successful... > > Whenever I had comparable problems, it was _always_ faulty RAM on my > local machine, and I'm very sure you're seeing a similar. _If_ gcc > crashes, it will always do that for the same input. > > Daniel > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists