lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:07:39 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: still worth running kernel cleanup scripts after merge windows?


  just curious if there's still value in running my kernel scanning
scripts after each merge window closes and posting results.  there's
still a fair bit of inconsistency and mismatches in the Kconfig files.

  as a single example, here's a snippet from the
drivers/message/fusion directory, identifying an apparently bad
reference to a non-existent CONFIG variable:

>>>>> FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:179:#ifdef CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:180:#if CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE  < 16
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:182:#elif CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE  > 256
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:185:#define MPT_SCSI_FC_SG_DEPTH  CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE

  but there is no such Kconfig variable FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE.  however:

$ grep -r FUSION_MAX drivers/message/fusion
drivers/message/fusion/Kconfig:config FUSION_MAX_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#if CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE  < 16
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#elif CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE  > 128
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#define MPT_SCSI_SG_DEPTH	CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#ifdef CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#if CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE  < 16
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#elif CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE  > 256
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.h:#define MPT_SCSI_FC_SG_DEPTH	CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE
$

  so is that a typo?  should "FUSION_MAX_FC_SGE" really be just
"FUSION_MAX_SGE"?  anyway, you get the idea.  or maybe i should just
put the scripts up at my wiki and people can run their at their
leisure on whatever part of the source tree interests them.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ