lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:32:04 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, sivanich@....com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, dipankar@...ibm.com, josh@...edesktop.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] stop_machine: reimplement using cpuhog On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:53:21 +0900 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: > Reimplement stop_machine using cpuhog. As cpuhogs are guaranteed to > be available for all online cpus, stop_machine_create/destroy() are no > longer necessary and removed. question; stop_machine pretty much also stops interrupts (it has to, at least for the users of stop_machine).. do cpu_hogs do this too? (if they don't, cpu_hogs aren't safe for some of the users of stop_machine, like code patching etc) -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists