[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100308035143.GE20695@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:51:43 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/26] oprofile: Performance counter multiplexing
> the tests I run with oprofile do not indicate unreliable ring_buffer
Did you try it with callgraph mode? That seems to be worst.
> behavior. Maybe my use cases and loads are different. Can you describe
> a setup where this may happen for sure? What is the impact, do you
Seeing it on very busy 16 CPU and larger systems.
> have lost samples or inconsistent buffer data? Is the data loss in
There are a lot of lost samples, callgraphs are incomplete etc.
> kernel or user space? Also, I am not aware that the ring_buffer is
Not sure.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists