lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:04:34 +0545
From:	Ravi Kumar Kulkarni <>
Subject: Re: Info on AT91 patches against mainline kernel

>>> You do not necessarily need the at91-patchset from Andrew.
>>> 2.6.33 works fine on at91sam9261 without it...
>>> Remy
>> Thanks for the info. I will try to compile 2.6.33  now. But i got a mail
>> from andrew  that he updated at91 patchset to 2.6.32 . for clarification jus
>> verifying tat u mean  from 2.6.33 onwards  u  don't need at91 patches and
>> can directly compile without waiting Andrew's patchset . If tats case then
>> Andrew can update that in linux4samdotorg website so that it will be helpful
> You only need the changes from Andrew in case there is something in
> there that you require, you should look at the changelog to be sure.
> But, the at91sam9261 is already for several years in mainline and it
> works fine (even much older kernels than 2.6.33 will work without it,
> for example we used 2.6.24, 2.6.26, 2.6.31 without it), Andrews
> patchset is just a set of additional changes that will likely be
> pushed to mainline at some time.
> Remy
got it. thanks a lot for your clarification and info.
warm regards,
Ravi Kulkarni.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists