linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1268087062.2830.285.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:24:22 -0800
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] sched: fix select_idle_sibling() logic in
 select_task_rq_fair()

On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:25 -0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:39 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (fix_lat_ctx.patch)
> > Performance improvements with this patch:
> > "lat_ctx -s 0 2" ~22usec (before-this-patch)	~5usec (after-this-patch)
> 
> Hm.  On my Q6600 box, it's nowhere near that.

My numbers are based on an atom netbook.

> Calling the waking cpu idle in that case is a mistake.  Just because the
> sync hint was used does not mean there is no gain to be had. 

Ok. I dropped that part in v2 patches that I just posted.

thanks,
suresh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/