[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B949E43.2010906@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:50:43 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] WARNING: at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3420
Li Zefan wrote:
> While running a ftrace test, a kernel warning showed up. The bug is not so
> easy to reproduce, normally it takes 30 mins to 2 hours.
>
> After revering 3c05d7482777f15e71bb4cb1ba78dee2800dfec6, I ran the test
> for 15 hours, and the bug seems disapeared.
>
This bug exhausted us, we found a issue: a tiny window which is
one of causes of this bug. This patch is to close this tiny window.
(bug is not fixed)
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
ringbuffer resizing and reseting will increase the ->record_disabled
and then wait until a rcu_shced grace period passes.
Contrarily, testing ->record_disabled should be at the same
preempt disabled critical region as writing into ringbuffer, otherwise
it will leave a window break ringbuffer resizing or reseting.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 8c1b2d2..54191d6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2232,12 +2232,12 @@ ring_buffer_lock_reserve(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long length)
if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON)
return NULL;
- if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
- return NULL;
-
/* If we are tracing schedule, we don't want to recurse */
resched = ftrace_preempt_disable();
+ if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
+ goto out_nocheck;
+
if (trace_recursive_lock())
goto out_nocheck;
@@ -2469,11 +2469,11 @@ int ring_buffer_write(struct ring_buffer *buffer,
if (ring_buffer_flags != RB_BUFFERS_ON)
return -EBUSY;
- if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
- return -EBUSY;
-
resched = ftrace_preempt_disable();
+ if (atomic_read(&buffer->record_disabled))
+ goto out;
+
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists