[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100309092054.b18a4ff2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:20:54 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting
infrastructure
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:18:45 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:07:11 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hmm...accepatable ? (sounds it's in error-range)
> >
> > BTW, why local_irq_disable() ?
> > local_irq_save()/restore() isn't better ?
> >
> I don't have any strong reason. All of lock_page_cgroup() is *now* called w/o irq disabled,
> so I used just disable()/enable() instead of save()/restore().
My point is, this will be used under treelock soon.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists