linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: update for semaphore to mutex conversion of devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:47:02 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: update for semaphore to mutex conversion of 
 devices

Hi Jean,

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:39:50 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks.  The include of mutex.h is not actually needed yet as Greg didn't
> > send the semaphore to mutex change to Linus due to other issues.
> 
> It will never be needed, and I also removed the include of semaphore.h.
> The beauty of the new API is that it hides the implementation details
> from the caller!

Yeah, except it scares me a little since device.h currently does not
directly include semaphore.h and the patch that changes the semaphore to
a mutex does not include mutex.h in device.h either ...

I guess that is a problem for Greg, though.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped