[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100309111523.GL28189@discord.disaster>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:15:23 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, aschnell@...e.de,
knikanth@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de,
Jim Meyering <jim@...ering.net>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:16:01PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> > I did almost all my tests with scsi_debug or MD RAID0 on scsi_debug.
> > It works as expected.
>
> Actually, for raid0, the alignment is questionable. Should it be a
> multiple of chunk size or whole stripe size? I'm not sure, both ways
> has bad and good sides.. But if it is the latter, the same issues
> pops up again: do a 3-disk raid0 and you'll have to align to 3*2^N.
Yes, alignment is still needed, especially for filesystems that can
do stripe unit aligned allocation like XFS. If you don't align the
filesystem properly, all the data IO will be mis-aligned to the
underlying disks and stripe unit sized IO will hit multiple disks
rather than just one....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists