[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100309153628.GA2371@aftab>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:36:28 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants
> On 02/27/2010 12:28 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Yeah, let's give it another round of testing and queue it for .35 -
> > AFAIR Ingo runs also a wide testing effort so it spending another cycle
> > in -tip and being hammered on by us could give us a bit more certainty.
> >
>
> Yes, if we can get into -tip then we'll get more test coverage, so I'll
> queue it up for .35 as soon as the merge window closes. Please remind
> me if I forget.
Hi Peter,
I see that you've added the HWEIGHT-capitalized interfaces for
compile-time constants with fce877e3. Which means, the bits in
<include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h> from your original patch at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/4/119 need changing (or have changed already
but I've missed them).
IOW, where can I get the current version of that last patch so that I can
base my __arch_hweightXX stuff ontop of it for testing?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
-
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists