[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268150156.3113.12.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:55:56 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.34-rc1] CPU stalls when closing TCP sockets.
Le mardi 09 mars 2010 à 15:54 +0900, Tetsuo Handa a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Nothing comes to my mind, I'll try to reproduce this here.
>
> When stopped at (8), Ctrl-C doesn't work.
>
> > Is 2.6.33 OK ?
>
> Yes. 2.6.33 and earlier are OK.
OK thanks !
I believe commit d218d11133d888f9745802146a50255a4781d37a
(tcp: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism) might be the bug origin.
I am testing following patch, based on latest net-2.6 tree (including
the LINUX_MIB_TCPMINTTLDROP bit)
[PATCH] tcp: Fix tcp_v4_rcv()
Commit d218d111 (tcp: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism) added a bug
for TIMEWAIT sockets. We should not test min_ttl for TW sockets.
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 8d51d39..70df409 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1651,15 +1651,15 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!sk)
goto no_tcp_socket;
+process:
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
+ goto do_time_wait;
+
if (unlikely(iph->ttl < inet_sk(sk)->min_ttl)) {
NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_TCPMINTTLDROP);
goto discard_and_relse;
}
-process:
- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
- goto do_time_wait;
-
if (!xfrm4_policy_check(sk, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
goto discard_and_relse;
nf_reset(skb);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists